Unlike streaming networks, which can bury their junk and still win awards for its prestige content or broadcast networks that have to worry deeply about offending any of their increasingly fewer viewers, TLC lives in their crud. Heck, they often celebrate it.

“It’s unlike any other programming on TV right now,” says one friend, who spoke on a condition of anonymity and we all understand why. “It’s against social norms. We don’t have a lot of drama in our lives, but we watch it on TV.”

The other half of the couple adds: “It’s a world you just don’t know. You get sucked in.”

And maybe that the secret? TLC is the television equivalent of a highway car crash that you can’t look away from.

The loudest objection I hear to TLC programming is that it can feel exploitative and often mean in spirit. But I’d argue we are all accountable for our own reactions to the stories we see in the same way the participants are accountable for agreeing to be featured. Do I judge weird couples? Yes. But do I also cry watching “My 600 Lb. Life”? Absolutely. And did everyone featured on any of these shows knowingly sign up to be on TV? Definitely.

TLC hasn’t been The Learning Channel for a long time, to the disappointment of many. But they’ve found success, perhaps, in deciding that there was an audience for Television that Loathes the Conventional.

Revisiting the fall’s ‘Big Leap’ into less-‘Ordinary’ series

Now, tossing it over to Brian Lowry with a mid-fall TV update.

“One of the problems reviewing series that have slightly more ambition than ‘FBI’ spinoffs is the question of whether a frontloaded couple of episodes can actually be sustained over the course of a season, much less multiple seasons.

Fox’s ‘Big Leap’ might be the most impressive of the bunch, finding clever layers as it combines the characters — participating in a fictitious reality-TV dance show — in unexpected ways. It’s consistently sweet, funny and fairly smart about how the reality sausage gets made, with Scott Foley shining as the amoral producer who’ll step over pretty much anyone in pursuit of a second-season renewal.

Finally, ‘Ghosts’ has stood out as a non-cookie-cutter comedy for CBS, with a couple moving into a house inhabited by ghosts from different eras. Although it has the benefit of being adapted from a British show, that’s no guarantee of durability on a more expansive US TV schedule, which the show has thus far exhibited.

All told, it’s an encouraging sign for the major networks, which at times have appeared willing to ride their existing franchises (‘Chicago’ everything, ‘Law & Order,’ etc.) into a steady march toward oblivion.

These new shows suggest there’s life in the model, especially if you’ll take a few creative risks to expand it.”

‘Class’ dismissed

For your weekend watch list, here’s Lowry again with a recommendation.

“OK, we get it, established intellectual property is all the rage, but the new ‘Head of the Class’ revival, on HBO Max (like CNN, a unit of WarnerMedia), feels more peripherally tethered to the mildly memorable show that preceded it than most.

Here, Isabella Gomez (a veteran of the ‘One Day at a Time’ revival) plays the slacker teacher to a group of high-achieving kids, in a series that feels as generic as that sounds. Despite the fresh faces, there’s little to distinguish this from a network sitcom in the 1980s.

As for connections to the original, Robin Givens shows up in a subsequent episode, which is nice.

In terms of making us look with the title, mission accomplished. Making us stick around is another matter.”

A ‘Symbol’-ic gesture

And another from Lowry: a programming note for the Peacock-less.

It’s a small thing, but the synergistic move is another example of the juggling act that studios face as they consider where their shows will fare the best. Frankly, ‘Lost Symbol’ might have been a long shot in any venue, but like ‘Head of the Class,’ it probably would have looked more at home on a broadcast network in the first place.”